|
|
-
New Developments on Whether the Absolute Pollution Exclusion Clause Bars Coverage for Non-environmental Pollution ( November 2001 )
The Supreme Court of Nebraska recently joined the majority by holding that xylene fumes created from the application of a floor sealant was a pollutant and therefore the absolute pollution exclusion barred coverage for damage caused by the fumes. -
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Issues Two Important Insurance Coverage Opinions ( November 2001 )
In a case of first impression, the court adopted a broad standard for known loss doctrine. In a second case the court remanded a pollution exclusion case with endorsement of regulatory estoppel principle. -
Pollution Exclusions: The Insurance Industry's Attempt to Limit Exposure ( August 2000 )
Ron Lowry is a former insurance defense attorney who now represents plaintiffs in serious injury and insurance case. -
New Virginia Decisions Address Pollution Exclusions ( July 2000 )
This alert examines two Virginia decisions that addressed the issue of pollution exclusion and whether the carrier had a duty to defend despite the above-referenced exclusion in the policy. -
California Supreme Court Holds Insurers Have No Duty to Defend a Government Cleanup Order ( September 1998 )
In Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (1998) 18 Cal.4th 857, the Calif. -
Environmental Coverage Under Comprehensive General Liability Policies ( July 1998 )
Comprehensive General Liability ("CGL") insurance policies issued after the early 1970s contain some form of a poll.
Sponsored Links
