FindLaw
> Library
> Antitrust and Trade Regulation > Vertical Restraints > Tying and Related Arrangements
|
|
-
Did the Per Se Rule on Tying Survive 'Microsoft'? ( August 2002 )
Analysis of decisions which enunciate the modern Tying Doctrine. -
On November 5, 1999, United States District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson issued his much anticipated Findings of Fact in <I>United States v. Microsoft</I>, 65 F. Supp. 2d 1, 1999 WL 1001107 (D.D.C. 1999).
-
Pitfalls in Intellectual Property Licensing in the European Union ( June 1999 )
U.S. companies licensing their intellectual property - patents, copyrights or confidential know-how ("IP". -
Information Costs, Lifecycle Costs, Switching Costs, and Lock-In* ( October 1998 )
This article will analyze the role of information costs, lifecycle costs, switching costs, and lock-in in the context of market power determinations under the antitrust laws. -
The "Toblerone" Chocolate Bar Case ( October 1998 )
An important lesson to be learned by those conducting marketing research. -
If Kodak is Just a "Summary Judgment Case," Why are we Still Discussing it Three Years Later? ( October 1995 )
Groups that do not like landmark cases sometimes go into a state of denial. For example, many fruitless post-decision battles have been fought against <i>Brown v. Board of Education</i>, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). <i>Roe v. Wade</i>, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). -
The Benefits and Burdens of Kodak from a Litigant's Perspective ( September 1992 )
As co-counsel for plaintiffs in the Kodak case, we were obviously pleased by the result, which went beyond the Nin. -
Eastman Kodak Co. v. ITS: The Downfall of the Chicago School ( July 1992 )
The Supreme Court's recent decision in Eastman Kodak Co v. Image Technical Services, Case No. 90-1029, has sweepin.
Sponsored Links
